Please note:
This document is best suited for on-screen use. Some layout may have been altered during the creation of this web page.

It is recommended that you download the "pdf" version of this Course Profile for printing and the "Word, Mac, or WordPerfect" versions for working with or adapting the Course Profile to meet your instructional needs.

 

Course Profile   Geometry and Discrete Mathematics (MGA4U), Grade 12, University Preparation, Catholic

 

Course Overview

Policy Document:  The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, Mathematics, 2000.

Prerequisite:  Functions and Relations, Grade 11, University Preparation, MCR3U

Course Description

This course enables students to broaden mathematical knowledge and skills related to abstract mathematical topics and to the solving of complex problems. Students will solve problems involving geometric and Cartesian vectors, and intersections of lines and planes in three-space. They also develop an understanding of proof, using deductive, algebraic, vector, and indirect methods. Students will solve problems involving counting techniques and prove results using mathematical induction.

This course is designed for students planning to study university programs that are highly focused on mathematics, including engineering, pure mathematics, computer science, and the physical sciences. Contextual examples and activities should thus be drawn largely from these fields. Because of the academic demands of these programs, the expectations of this course require students to consistently demonstrate the ability to:

·         research, investigate, and construct mathematical concepts independently;

·         conjecture and, through inquiry, test a hypothesis in a variety of ways including using technology;

·         generate multiple types to solutions to complex problems which may cross strands and require abstract thinking;

·         analyse and design proofs from multiple perspectives.

 

This course is comprised of three strands: Proof and Problem Solving, Geometry, and Discrete Mathematics. These strands have been divided into a total of six units. Unit 1 – Deductive Geometry, encompasses the Proof and Problem Solving strand, in which students apply deductive, algebraic, and vector methods to demonstrate and prove properties of plane figures. The rigors of this curriculum require students to expand the depth of their understanding of the comprehensiveness of problem solving techniques. Independent work skills are stressed in this unit. The Geometry strand is divided into three units. In Unit 2 – Vectors and Unit 3 – Vector Applications, students investigate, manipulate, and apply geometric vectors. In Unit 4 – Intersections of Lines and Planes, students determine equations of lines and planes, solve systems of equations using matrices, and determine intersections of lines and planes. In the Discrete Mathematics strand, students solve problems involving counting techniques. Students use mathematical induction to prove the binomial theorem and the formulas for the sums of series. The Discrete Mathematics strand is also divided into two units. Unit 5 – Mathematical Induction and Combinatorics introduces sequences and series, mathematical induction, and counting techniques. Students further explore these concepts and apply their learning in Unit 6 – Application of Counting Techniques. A final summative unit contains activities designed to assess the students’ skills across the four categories of learning using a variety of instruments.

How This Course Supports the Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations

The mind and its capacity for rational analysis are seen as gifts from the Creator to be used and enjoyed. The training of the intellect ensures that all knowledge can be scrutinized and the divine and the human more deeply understood. In this sense, knowledge is illuminated with the light of faith. In Catholic education, the commitment to maturity of mind and academic excellence is always in reference to God’s revealed wisdom as to life’s purpose and meaning. One of the fundamental characteristics of our humanity is to discern meaning within our experience. That meaning, however tentative, once embraced, seeks expression in such a way that it becomes accessible to others. Critical, then, are the choices that the teacher makes around the language employed to convey the significance of this experience. The Faith dimension needs to be spelled out clearly in the rationale, expectations, strategies, and evaluation process of the curriculum.

Before each Unit Overview Chart, several Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations have been listed. These expectations can be easily addressed by the activities in each unit, as demonstrated in Unit 5 – Mathematical Induction and Combinatorics, one of the two units which has been fully developed in this Course Profile.

Course Notes

The Grade 12 Course Profiles produced by the Catholic and Public systems represent a collaborative effort between the two writing teams. The completed units provided in this profile are Unit 3 – Vector Applications, and Unit 5 – Mathematical Induction and Combinatorics. In addition to these two complete “sample” units, a less-detailed Unit Overview Chart offers a recommended clustering of expectations for each of the remaining units, and provides a starting point from which teachers can plan the delivery of the curriculum.

In this course, students use prerequisite skills in analytic geometry and extend their skills in verifying properties of plane figures to those of crafting formal proofs of the same properties. Deductive geometry provides a solid platform from which students can recognize and form efficient strategies for proof and problem solving using vector methods.

Displacement, velocity, force, work, and torque lend context to the introduction of vector properties, vector projections and the dot and cross products. As these applications are commonly associated with the natural sciences (and physics in particular), teaching strategies and investigations may be coordinated with the physics teacher. The notion that inductive reasoning and the ability to make informed decisions both involve an element of uncertainty should be reinforced for students destined for programs involving the application of mathematical principles to design problems. Wherever possible, dynamic geometry software should be used as a tool for recognizing patterns and suggesting conjectures.

For some students, mathematics is perceived to be a collection of isolated and complex topics, each requiring skills that may soon be forgotten. The mathematics teacher must address these perceptions by creating a context in which students can learn and connect concepts and skills. For example, properties of plane figures (from Unit 1) and the dot and cross products (from Unit 3) should be applied to problems involving the intersection of lines and planes (from Unit 4). Students must be exposed to a variety of teaching, learning, proving, and problem-solving techniques to best synthesize the information presented by the curriculum, and should be provided with applications and context to bring meaning to their learning.

The requisite spatial skills for the three-dimensional visualization demanded by this course and in many postsecondary destinations may be enhanced through the use of geometry software and through the construction of physical models.

The function of proof has traditionally been viewed as a verification of the accuracy of mathematical statements, and to remove personal doubt or uncertainty. Michael D. de Villiers, in his book Rethinking Proof with The Geometer’s Sketchpad (1999) proposes that this view be expanded to include several roles, including verification (concerned with the truth of a statement), explanation (providing insight into why this statement is true), systematization (the organization of various results into a deductive system of axioms, major concepts and theorems), discovery (the exploration, discovery, or invention of new results), communication (the transmission of mathematical knowledge), and intellectual challenge (the self-realization/fulfillment derived from constructing a proof). It is in this spirit that the teacher should deliver the curriculum for this course. Proof and problem solving are indeed at the core of the MGA4U curriculum. Several of the overall and specific expectations refer directly to the comprehensive nature by which these topics should be approached.

Although the expectations contained in the MGA4U (Geometry and Discrete Mathematics) course are fewer in number than in the Grade 12 University Preparation courses MCB4U (Advanced Functions and Introductory Calculus) and MDM4U (Mathematics of Data Management), they are broad in scope, allowing for the exploration and extension of a wide range of topics at the teacher’s discretion. This breadth enables the teacher to use a wide variety of teaching strategies, learning materials, and resources, as befits a course of this academic rigour.

Of particular prominence in this course is the specific expectation PS3.03, requiring students to demonstrate significant learning and the effective use of skills in tasks such as solving challenging problems, researching problems, applying mathematics, creating proofs, using technology effectively, and presenting course topics or extensions of course topics. The teacher may wish to consider the use of an independent project as a means of addressing this expectation in part. Students would be required to research new contexts in which problem-solving and proving techniques may be applied. In order to revisit this expectation throughout the course, the teacher may wish to introduce this project early in the year. The students’ research would then comprise a portion of the final summative evaluation.

The activities in this profile are designed to both introduce and consolidate skills necessary for success in MGA4U. These activities can be used in conjunction with or independently of one another. Teaching strategies and suggestions for technological tools are included to help teachers present the lessons contained in the activities.

Because this course has been designed to prepare students for further mathematical studies at university, the specific nature of the learning activities should reflect this destination. In particular, students in this course should routinely be challenged with investigations and problems which require sustained, independent effort. Students destined for university should have the opportunity to develop and demonstrate a high level of complex problem-solving ability.

Several of the activities presented in this profile include extensions of the required content, which can be used to meet the need to challenge gifted students.

Units:  Titles and Time

Unit 1

Deductive Geometry

18.5 hours

Unit 2

Vectors

12.5 hours

* Unit 3

Vector Applications

   15 hours

Unit 4

Intersections of Lines and Planes

   19 hours

* Unit 5

Mathematical Induction and Combinatorics

   19 hours

Unit 6

Applications of Counting Techniques

   16 hours

Unit 7

Final Summative Assessment

   10 hours

* These units are fully developed in this Course Profile.

 

Unit Overviews

Unit 1:  Deductive Geometry

Time:  18.5 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g, CGE7b, CGE7j.

Unit Description

The language of deductive geometry, e.g., properties, theorems, etc., is introduced. Geometric properties studied in previous grades are revisited using dynamic geometry software. Further properties of plane figures are investigated and linked to applicable theorems. Students are introduced to the structure of formal deductive proofs. Strategies for establishing proof are explored through cooperative and individual learning. Indirect methods of proof are used to prove some properties of plane geometry.

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

PSV.01, PSV.03, PS1.01, PS3.03

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication

Introduce the language of proofs, e.g., proposition, converse, property, axiom, theorem, if, if and only if.

2

PSV.01, PSV.02, PS1.01, PS1.06, PS2.02, PS2.03

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Application

Investigate the properties of plane figures and the theorems that pertain to them using dynamic geometry software.

3

PSV.01, PSV.02, PSV.03, PS1.01, PS1.02, PS1.06, PS2.01, PS2.02, PS2.03, PS2.04, PS3.03

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Test conjectures and prove properties of plane figures using deduction.

4

PSV.01, PSV.02, PSV.03, PS1.01, PS1.05, PS2.01, PS2.02, PS3.03

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Prove some properties of plane figures using indirect methods.

5

All within unit

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Summative Assessment

 

Unit 2:  Vectors

Time:  12.5 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g, CGE7b, CGE7j.

Unit Description

Students are introduced to the concept of vectors as directed line segments. The addition, subtraction and scalar multiplication of geometric vectors are investigated. The algebraic and geometric properties of vectors are applied to proofs of properties of plane figures and to velocity and force problems. Dynamic geometry software is used as a tool to make conjectures and verify vector properties. Students will use vector methods to prove some of the same properties of plane figures that were explored in Unit 1 – Deductive Geometry.

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

GEV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.04, PS2.02

Knowledge/ Understanding
Application

Define vectors as directed line segments and use a geometric representation of addition of displacement vectors to propose various billiards shots. The distinction between vector and scalar quantities is made.

2

GEV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.04, PS2.03

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication

Investigate the properties of addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication of geometric vectors using dynamic geometry software.

3

GEV.01, PSV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, PS1.04, PS1.06, PS2.01, PS2.02, PS2.03

Knowledge/ Understanding
Communication
Application

Prove properties of plane figures using geometric vectors.

4

GEV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.03, GE1.04, PS2.01, PS2.04

Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Applications geometric vectors: force and velocity. Introduce projections of geometric vectors through the resolution of the gravitational force into components.

5

All within unit

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Summative assessment

Unit 3: Vector Applications

Time:  15 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g.

Unit Description

Cartesian vectors are represented in two-space and three-space as ordered pairs and triples, respectively. The addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication of Cartesian vectors are investigated. Applications involving work and torque are used to introduce and lend context to the dot and cross products of Cartesian vectors. The vector and scalar projections of Cartesian vectors are written in terms of the dot product. The properties of vector products are investigated and proven. These vector products will be revisited to predict characteristics of the solutions of systems of lines and planes in Unit 4 – Intersections of Lines and Planes.

Unit Overview Chart

Activity

Time

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Tasks

3.1
The Sum of the Parts is the Same as the Whole

3.75 hours

GEV.01, PSV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.06, GE1.07, PS1.06, PS2.01, PS2.02, PS2.03

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Introduce and investigate Cartesian vectors. The properties of addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication are applied to Cartesian vectors.

3.2
Work It Out!

2.5 hours

GEV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.03, PS2.01, PS2.03

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Investigate the dot product of geometric and Cartesian vectors through the concept of physical work.

3.3
Dot’s Enough!

3.75 hours

GEV.01, PSV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.03, GE1.05, PS1.04, PS1.06, PS2.01, PS2.02, PS2.03

Knowledge/ Understanding
Communication
Application

Investigate the properties of the dot product of Cartesian vectors. The dot product is applied to the physical definition of work and to the determination of the geometric relationships between vectors.

3.4
Don’t Cross Me!

2.5 hours

GEV.01, PSV.01, PSV.02, GE1.01, GE1.02, GE1.03, PS1.04, PS2.01, PS2.02

Communication
Application

Investigate the properties of the cross product of geometric and Cartesian vectors. The cross product is applied to the physical definition of torque and to the determination of the geometric relationships between vectors.

3.5
Summative Assessment

2.5 hours

All within unit

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Summative assessment

 

Unit 4:  Intersections of Lines and Planes

Time:  19 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g, CGE7b, CGE7j.

Unit Description

Students determine the vector and parametric equations of lines in two-space, the vector, parametric and symmetric equations of lines in three-space and the vector, parametric and scalar equations of planes. The intersections of two lines, a line and a plane, two planes, and three planes are investigated. Matrices are used to represent systems of up to three unknowns and row reduction is used to solve the systems. The types of solution sets are related to the geometric properties of the system.

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

GEV.01, GEV.02, GE1.06, GE1.07, GE2.01

Knowledge/Understanding
Application

Determine the equations of lines (vector, parametric, and symmetric) in two and three dimensions.

2

GEV.01, GEV.02, GE1.06, GE1.07, GE2.03

Knowledge/Understanding
Communication

Determine the vector, parametric, and scalar equations of planes.

3

GEV.01, GEV.02, GE1.06, GE1.07, GE2.02, GE2.04

Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Application

Determine the intersections of two lines, a line, and a plane.

4

GEV.02, GE2.07, GE2.08, GE2.09

Knowledge/Understanding
Communication
Application

Solve systems of linear equations to determine the intersections of two or three planes. Interpret the solutions geometrically.

5

GEV.02, GE2.05, GE2.06

Knowledge/Understanding
Communication
Application

Introduces matrices, use them to solve systems of equations pertaining to the intersections of planes.

6

All within unit

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Summative assessment

 

Unit 5:  Mathematical Induction and Combinatorics

Time: 19 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE3c, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5g, CGE7b.

Unit Description

Students use pattern recognition to derive formulas for the terms and sums of arithmetic and geometric sequences and series. Sigma notation is used to express a series as a sum of related terms. Mathematical induction is introduced as an effective means of proving sequence- and series-related results. Inductive reasoning skills are extended in the proof of other algebraic results. Using factorial notation, permutations, and combinations, students solve introductory counting problems.

Unit Overview Chart

Activity

Time

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Tasks

5.1
ReCurses! Foiled Again!
5.1a
But Series-ly, Folks

Follow-Up Skills




1 hour

0.75 hours

DMV.02, PSV.02, PSV.03, DM2.01, DM2.02, PS2.02, PS3.01, PS3.03
CGE2b, CGE3c, CGE4b, CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication

Determine sums of series using pattern recognition and deductive reasoning; Consolidate understanding of concepts and terms

5.1b
Pick a Tooth, Any Tooth

Follow-Up Skills

 

1.25 hours

0.5 hours

 

 

Use an informal mathematical induction proof and recursive thinking to determine formulas for use in the construction of geometric figures

5.2
Induction-Duction, What’s Your Function?
5.2a A Guess, Even Better Than the Real Thing?

Follow-Up Skills

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour

0.25 hours

PSV.02, PSV.03, DMV.02, PS2.01, PS2.04, PS3.01, PS3.03, DM2.01, DM2.02, DM2.03
CGE3c, CGE4b, CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Use inductive reasoning to conjecture formulas based on pattern recognition

5.2b
Elementary, My Dear Watson

Follow-Up Skills

1 hour


0.25 hours

 

 

Use deductive reasoning to verify conjectures

5.2c
What’s So Funny About Peace, Love, and Mathematical Induction?

Follow-Up Skills

1.25 hours



2.5 hours

 

 

Investigate the method of proof by mathematical induction

5.3
Ah, Let Me Count The Ways!!!!

2.5 hours

DMV.01, PSV.02, DM1.01, DM1.05, PS2.01, PS2.04
CGE2c, CGE4a, CGE5g, CGE7b

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Application

Explore additive counting techniques; Consolidate understanding of concepts and terms; Explore multiplicative counting techniques

5.4
Ping-Pong or Pong-Ping, Does It Matter?

Follow-Up Skills

3.75 hours



1 hour

DMV.01, PSV.02, PSV.03, DM1.01, DM1.02, DM1.03, DM1.04, DM1.05, PS2.01, PS2.03, PS2.04, PS3.01
CGE2b, CGE3c, CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Define factorial notation; Investigate permutations and combinations

Summative Assessment

2 hours

PSV.02, PSV.03, DMV.01, DMV.02, PS2.01, PS2.04, PS3.01, PS3.03, DM1.01, DM1.02, DM1.03, DM1.05, DM2.01, DM2.02, DM2.03
CGE3c, CGE4b, CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/ Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Consolidate new learning

 

Unit 6:  Applications of Counting Techniques

Time:  16 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g, CGE7b, CGE7j.

Unit Description

Students solve counting problems in diverse contexts. The binomial theorem and its connection to Pascal’s Triangle are investigated. Students explore and prove properties of Pascal’s Triangle using inductive reasoning.

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

DMV.01, PSV.02, DM1.04, DM1.05, PS2.03, PS2.04

Communication
Application

Solve counting problems, including card games, tournaments, shaking of hands, spread of rumours, poker hands, probability

2

DMV.01, DMV.02, DM1.06, DM1.07, DM2.01, DM2.04, DM2.05

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Use sigma notation and combinatorics to express the terms of a binomial expansion; Introduce Pascal’s Triangle; Prove various results using Pascal’s Triangle and mathematical induction

3

All within unit

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Summative assessment

Unit 7:  Final Summative Assessment

Time:  10 hours

Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations:  CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE3c, CGE3e, CGE4a, CGE4b, CGE4f, CGE5a, CGE5g, CGE7b, CGE7j.

Unit Description

Summative assessment should be designed to provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate comprehensive learning in each of the four Achievement Chart categories. Several ideas are suggested in the Unit Overview Chart, however any of the various assessment tools mentioned in the Assessment Strategies section could be utilized. Due to the emphasis of cumulative tests and examinations in university programs, a formal final examination should play a prominent role in the final summative assessment of the student. A short paper-and-pencil task could be used to assess key terms, skills, and concepts.

In this course, students are expected to demonstrate significant learning and the effective use of skills in tasks such as solving challenging problems, researching problems, applying mathematics, creating proofs, using technology effectively, and presenting course topics or extensions of course topics (PS3.03). An independent research project could allow students to revisit the course expectations in a new mathematical context and at the same time provide exposure to concepts that they may encounter at university. The context provides interest and direction, but it is only the tool with which the expectations are addressed. Accordingly, students would not be assessed on the context itself, but rather the degree to which the selected topics apply to the course expectations. The teacher may wish to introduce this project early in the year/term, to allow students time to select and research their topic. Students could present their projects to the class or take part in a mathematics fair, and submit a written component at the end of the course.

As summative evaluation is to comprise of 30% of the final grade, it is suggested that the final examination comprise of the majority of this component.

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations (by Strand)

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

All Strands

Knowledge/Understanding
Application

Assess key concepts and terms

2

All Strands

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Research and investigate extensions to course topics;
Apply a variety of problem-solving and proving techniques

3

All Strands

Knowledge/Understanding
Thinking/Inquiry/Problem Solving
Communication
Application

Final examination

 

Note: Research topics may include Fibonacci patterns, paradoxes, Euler’s line/segment, mathematical logic, perspective drawing, chaos theory, number theory, linear programming, complex variables, vector applications in physics, fractals, perfect triangles and rectangles, golden rectangles/spirals, game theory, probability, tesselations, cryptography, networks, topography, the slide rule, Escher art, Boolean algebra, Moebius strips, Buffon’s Needle Problem, Pascal’s Triangle, special number systems, etc.

Teaching/Learning Strategies

In order to address the wide range of expectations in this course, a variety of teaching, learning, and assessment strategies and tools need to be used. Teachers should assume a variety of roles (including guide, facilitator, consultant, and instructor), and should employ a variety of strategies including:

·         a balance of whole-class, small group, mixed-ability structured group, and individual instruction through student-centred and teacher-directed activities (group work should be carefully structured along cooperative learning principles to be effective);

·         the use of rich contextual problems which engage students and provide them with opportunities to demonstrate learning and appreciate the need for new skills;

·         approaches that will accommodate multiple learning styles, e.g., the provision of verbal and written instructions, the inclusion of hands-on activities, etc.;

·         the use of technological tools and software, e.g., graphing software, dynamic geometry software, the Internet, spreadsheets, and multimedia in activities, demonstrations, and investigations to facilitate the exploration and understanding of mathematical concepts;

·         the use of learning/performance tasks that are designed to link several expectations and give the students occasion to demonstrate their optimal levels of achievement through the demonstration of skill acquisition, the communication of results, the ability to pose extending questions following an inquiry, and the determination of a solution to unfamiliar problems;

·         the use of accommodations, remediation, and/or extension activities, where necessary, to meet the needs of exceptional students;

·         the provision of opportunities for students to practise and extend their skills and knowledge outside of the classroom.

In addition to the contribution of the teacher, students play an active role in their learning. In order to successfully complete the requirements of this course, students are expected to:

·         develop an increased responsibility for their own learning;

·         be accountable for prerequisite skills;

·         participate as active learners;

·         engage in explorations using technology;

·         apply individual and group learning skills;

Assessment Strategies

The Achievement Chart for Mathematics is the basis of all assessment and evaluation for this course. An effective assessment program in Mathematics must include a balance of diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment instruments that incorporate the categories of learning as defined in The Achievement Chart for Mathematics.

Assessment tools such as observational checklists, performance criteria, rubrics, marking schemes, and rating scales can and should be used to assist in developing objective and consistent evaluations of student achievement.

Assessment & Evaluation of Student Achievement

Assessment, as defined in the document Ontario Secondary Schools, Grades 9-12: Program and Diploma Requirements, 1999, is “the process of gathering information from a variety of sources (including assignments, demonstrations, projects, performances, and tests) that accurately reflects how well students are achieving the curriculum expectations” (p. 31). Assessment tools should be designed to allow students to demonstrate the full extent of their learning across the four categories of knowledge and skills. As teachers will use a variety of assessment tools, it is necessary to ensure that a consistent standard is maintained. These tools should be developed with the learning expectations of the course as the criteria for this standard. Students’ effective demonstration of communication skills is an essential component when evaluating achievement. Students are required to display and convey their knowledge and understanding of concepts, share their process of thought and inquiry, and justify their application of concepts in an unfamiliar situation. In addition, their ability to communicate these skills is also assessed.

It should also be noted that teachers must continue to expand their understanding of application skills to include non-routine applications. This view requires a shift from the specific application of concepts, i.e., familiar situations, to the general application of concepts, i.e., unfamiliar situations.

Assessment strategies and tools must address a wide variety of teaching and learning styles in addition to the criteria established by the learning expectations. Tests consisting only of questions that ask students to perform algorithms and apply their knowledge do not necessarily offer an opportunity for students to demonstrate Level 4 performance. An effective and well-balanced assessment program will provide students with several opportunities to demonstrate growth and improvement over time, across all of the knowledge and skill categories.

Evaluation, as defined by Ontario Secondary Schools, Grades 9-12: Program and Diploma Requirements, 1999, is “the process of judging the quality of a student’s work on the basis of established achievement criteria, and assigning a value to represent that quality” (p. 31). Whereas assessment is the collection of information about student performance in a variety of methods, evaluation is the determination of a quantitative value describing the students’ overall level of achievement. As students can be expected to improve their performances over time, particular emphasis should be placed on their most recent and most consistent level of achievement.

Seventy per cent of the grade will be based on assessments and evaluations conducted throughout the course. Thirty per cent of the grade will be based on a final evaluation in the form of an examination, performance, essay, and/or other methods of evaluation.

Students who receive a final performance evaluation of Level 3 or better are well-prepared for study at the university level. Accordingly, in order to prepare students for the academic reality of most mathematically rich university programs, proper attention should be placed on the effective preparation of the student for a comprehensive final examination. While other rich, performance-based activities can and should be part of the Final Summative Assessment Unit, a formal examination should play a significant role in this particular course.

Accommodations

Teachers should consult individual student IEPs for specific direction on accommodation for individuals. Teachers should work in consultation with students, resource teachers, and ESL/ELD teachers, where available, and parents or guardians to determine appropriate accommodations and expanded learning opportunities as they work through the course in order to achieve the expectations described in the IEP.

·         Provide sets of reference notes, outlines, or critical information, as well as models of charts, timelines or diagrams.

·         Use visuals to illustrate definitions for the students’ dictionary of terms.

·         Pair written instructions with verbal instructions. Provide visual or auditory cues.

·         Provide opportunities for students to practise oral presentation skills.

·         Provide extensive student-teacher conferencing.

·         Provide an interpreter or a scribe to help formalize the students’ reasoning.

·         Provide a list of terms (possibly simplified) before an activity begins. Include visual descriptions.

·         Adapt handouts in terms of the terminology and content used, as well as the size and typeface of the selected font. Allow plenty of space for written responses.

·         Allow assignments to be completed in alternate formats or using longer timelines. Provide intermediate deadlines with built-in conferencing at these dates.

·         Keep technology, manipulatives, grid paper, formula sheets, and other aids available for needs that arise.

Considerations for Enrichment

·         Pose open-ended questions that require higher-level thinking.

·         Model creative thinking strategies, such as decision-making and evaluation of problem-solving approaches, and facilitate original and independent problems and solutions.

·         Encourage independent investigations and projects.

Resources

This course profile has been provided as a resource to aid the teacher in delivering the curriculum. Through the discretionary use of other materials, the teacher can enrich, or otherwise supplement their students’ education.

Units in this course profile make reference to the use of specific texts, magazines, films, videos, and websites. Teachers need to consult their board policies regarding use of any copyrighted materials. Before reproducing materials for student use from printed publications, teachers need to ensure that their board has a Cancopy license and that this license covers the resources they wish to use. Before screening videos/films with their students, teachers need to ensure that their board/school has obtained the appropriate public performance videocassette license from an authorized distributor, e.g., Audio Cine Films Inc. Teachers are reminded that much of the material on the Internet is protected by copyright. The copyright is usually owned by the person or organization that created the work. Reproduction of any work or substantial part of any work on the Internet is not allowed without the permission of the owner

Software (Ministry-Licensed)

The Geometer’s Sketchpad (dynamic geometry)

Fathom (statistical software)

Maple (word processor/programming)

Math Trek (concept and skill development)

Zap-a-Graph (graphing)

Software (Freeware)

Peanuts (concept and skill development) (http://math.exeter.edu/rparris)

Internet sites

The URLs for the websites were verified by the writers prior to publication. Given the frequency with which these designations change, teachers should always verify the websites prior to assigning them for the students’ use.

Canadian Education on the Web (http://www.oise.on.ca/~mpress/eduweb.html)
A compendium of Canadian education-related resources maintained by Marian Press at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.

Education Network of Ontario (http://www.enoreo.on.ca/)
ENO is a computer communications network for everyone who works in elementary and secondary education in Ontario. Members have private a
ccounts which entitle them to participate in moderated newsgroups on education topics and training.

Hewlett-Packard (http://www.hp.com/calculators/)

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (http://www.nctm.org)

Ontario Association of Mathematics Educators (http://www.oame.on.ca)

Ontario Curriculum Centre (http://www.curriculum.org)
Texas Instruments (http://www.ti.com/calc/docs)

Print

Concerning Assessment and Reflective Evaluation (CARE) Package (source – http://www.oame.on.ca)

Connecting Mathematics: Addenda Series, Grades 9-12. NCTM Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM, 1991. ISBN 0-87353-327-5

de Villiers, M. Rethinking Proof with The Geometer’s Sketchpad. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press, 1999. ISBN 1-55953-390-4

The Mathematics Teacher. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
ISBN 0025-5769

Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation. Quality Assessment. Toronto, ON: Educational Services Committee, 1999.

Taggart, G., ed. Rubrics – A Handbook for Construction and Use. Lancaster, PA: Techonomic Publishing, 1998.

OSS Considerations

The following list of resources will support many of the Ontario Secondary School Policies as well as the Ontario Catholic Secondary School Graduate Expectations:

Ministry of Education Policy and Reference Documents

Choices into Action: Guidance and Career Education Program Policy

Cooperative Education: Policies and Procedures for Ontario Secondary Schools

Individual Education Plans: Standards for Development, Program Planning, and Implementation, 2000

The Ontario Curriculum Mathematics, Grades 11-12, 2000

Ontario Schools Code of Conduct

Ontario Secondary Schools, Grades 9 to 12: Program and Diploma Requirements

Program Planning and Assessment, Grades 9-12

Violence-Free Schools Policy

The Ministry of Education has also published several resource documents, brochures, and policy/program memoranda in support of its OSS policies. They are available online at the Ministry of Education website, http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/document.html.

Publications Concerning Faith Development

Blueprints (Catholic Curriculum Cooperative - Central Ontario Region)

Catholicity Across The Curriculum (Ontario Catholic School Trustees’ Association)

Educating the Soul (Institute for Catholic Education)

Ontario Catholic Secondary School Graduate Expectations (Institute for Catholic Education)

This Moment of Promise (Ontario Conference of Catholic Bishops)

Creating Catholic Curriculum (Eastern Ontario Catholic Curriculum Cooperative)

Community Partnerships

Refer to local board policies, e.g., Relations with Business - Corporate Donations, Sponsorships and Agreements.


Coded Expectations, Geometry and Discrete Mathematics, Grade 12, University Preparation, MGA4U

Geometry

Overall Expectations

GEV.01 · perform operations with geometric and Cartesian vectors;

GEV.02 · determine intersections of lines and planes in three-space.

Specific Expectations

Operating with Geometric and Cartesian Vectors

GE1.01 – represent vectors as directed line segments;

GE1.02 – perform the operations of addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication on geometric vectors;

GE1.03 – determine the components of a geometric vector and the projection of a geometric vector;

GE1.04 – model and solve problems involving velocity and force;

GE1.05 – determine and interpret the dot product and cross product of geometric vectors;

GE1.06 – represent Cartesian vectors in two-space and in three-space as ordered pairs or ordered triples;

GE1.07 – perform the operations of addition, subtraction, scalar multiplication, dot product, and cross product on Cartesian vectors.

Determining Intersections of Lines and Planes in Three-Space

GE2.01 – determine the vector and parametric equations of lines in two-space and the vector, parametric, and symmetric equations of lines in three-space;

GE2.02 – determine the intersections of lines in three-space;

GE2.03 – determine the vector, parametric, and scalar equations of planes;

GE2.04 – determine the intersection of a line and a plane in three-space;

GE2.05 – solve systems of linear equations involving up to three unknowns, using row reduction of matrices, with and without the aid of technology;

GE2.06 – interpret row reduction of matrices as the creation of a new linear system equivalent to the original;

GE2.07 – determine the intersection of two or three planes by setting up and solving a system of linear equations in three unknowns;

GE2.08 – interpret a system of two linear equations in two unknowns and a system of three linear equations in three unknowns geometrically, and relate the geometrical properties to the type of solution set the system of equations possesses;

GE2.09 – solve problems involving the intersections of lines and planes, and present the solutions with clarity and justification.

Proof and Problem Solving

Overall Expectations

PSV.01 · prove properties of plane figures by deductive, algebraic, and vector methods;

PSV.02 · solve problems, using a variety of strategies;

PSV.03 · complete significant problem-solving tasks independently.

Specific Expectations

Proving Properties of Plane Figures by Deductive, Algebraic, and Vector Methods

PS1.01 – demonstrate an understanding of the principles of deductive proof (e.g., the role of axioms; the use of “if … then” statements; the use of “if and only if” statements and the necessity to prove them in both directions; the fact that the converse of a proposition differs from the proposition) and of the relationship of deductive proof to inductive reasoning;

PS1.02 – prove some properties of plane figures (e.g., circles, parallel lines, congruent triangles, right triangles), using deduction;

PS1.03 – prove some properties of plane figures (e.g., the midpoints of the sides of a quadrilateral are the vertices of a parallelogram; the line segment joining the midpoints of two sides of a triangle is parallel to the third side) algebraically, using analytic geometry;

PS1.04 – prove some properties of plane figures, using vector methods;

PS1.05 – prove some properties of plane figures, using indirect methods;

PS1.06 – demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between formal proof and the illustration of properties that is carried out by using dynamic geometry software.

Using a Variety of Strategies to Solve Problems

PS2.01 – solve problems by effectively combining a variety of problem-solving strategies (e.g., brainstorming, considering cases, choosing algebraic/geometric/vector or direct/indirect approaches, working backwards, visualizing by using concrete materials or diagrams or software, iterating, varying parameters, creating a model, introducing a coordinate system);

PS2.02 – generate multiple solutions to the same problem;

PS2.03 – use technology effectively in making and testing conjectures;

PS2.04 – solve complex problems and present the solutions with clarity and justification.

Completing Significant Problem-Solving Tasks Independently

PS3.01 – solve problems of significance, working independently, as individuals and in small groups;

PS3.02 – solve problems requiring effort over extended periods of time;

PS3.03 – demonstrate significant learning and the effective use of skills in tasks such as solving challenging problems, researching problems, applying mathematics, creating proofs, using technology effectively, and presenting course topics or extensions of course topics.

Discrete Mathematics

Overall Expectations

DMV.01 · solve problems, using counting techniques;

DMV.02 · prove results, using mathematical induction.

Specific Expectations

Using Counting Techniques

DM1.01 – solve problems, using the additive and multiplicative counting principles;

DM1.02 – express the answers to permutation and combination problems, using standard combinatorial symbols [e.g. , P(n, r)];

DM1.03 – evaluate expressions involving factorial notation, using appropriate methods (e.g., evaluate mentally, by hand, by using a calculator);

DM1.04 – solve problems involving permutations and combinations, including problems that require the consideration of cases;

DM1.05 – explain solutions to counting problems with clarity and precision;

DM1.06 – describe the connections between Pascal’s triangle, values of , and values for the binomial coefficients;

DM1.07 – solve problems, using the binomial theorem to determine terms in the expansion of a binomial.

Using Mathematical Induction to Prove Results

DM2.01 – demonstrate an understanding of the principle of mathematical induction;

DM2.02 – use sigma notation to represent a series or the sum of a series;

DM2.03 – prove the formulas for the sums of series, using mathematical induction;

DM2.04 – prove the binomial theorem, using mathematical induction;

DM2.05 – prove relationships between the coefficients in Pascal’s triangle, by mathematical induction and directly.

 


Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations

 

The graduate is expected to be:

 

A Discerning Believer Formed in the Catholic Faith Community   who

 

CGE1a    -illustrates a basic understanding of the saving story of our Christian faith;

CGE1b    -participates in the sacramental life of the church and demonstrates an understanding of the centrality of the Eucharist to our Catholic story;

CGE1c    -actively reflects on God’s Word as communicated through the Hebrew and Christian scriptures;

CGE1d    -develops attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to promote social responsibility, human solidarity and the common good;

CGE1e    -speaks the language of life... “recognizing that life is an unearned gift and that a person entrusted with life does not own it but that one is called to protect and cherish it.” (Witnesses to Faith)

CGE1f     -seeks intimacy with God and celebrates communion with God, others and creation through prayer and worship;

CGE1g    -understands that one’s purpose or call in life comes from God and strives to discern and live out this call throughout life’s journey;

CGE1h    -respects the faith traditions, world religions and the life-journeys of all people of good will;

CGE1i     -integrates faith with life;

CGE1j     -recognizes that “sin, human weakness, conflict and forgiveness are part of the human journey” and that the cross, the ultimate sign of forgiveness is at the heart of redemption. (Witnesses to Faith)

 

An Effective Communicator   who

CGE2a    -listens actively and critically to understand and learn in light of gospel values;

CGE2b    -reads, understands and uses written materials effectively;

CGE2c    -presents information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;

CGE2d    -writes and speaks fluently one or both of Canada’s official languages;

CGE2e    -uses and integrates the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of the arts, media, technology and information systems to enhance the quality of life.

 

A Reflective and Creative Thinker   who

CGE3a    -recognizes there is more grace in our world than sin and that hope is essential in facing all challenges;

CGE3b    -creates, adapts, evaluates new ideas in light of the common good;

CGE3c    -thinks reflectively and creatively to evaluate situations and solve problems;

CGE3d    -makes decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;

CGE3e    -adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject areas and experience;

CGE3f     -examines, evaluates and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical, political, ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a just and compassionate society.

 

A Self-Directed, Responsible, Life Long Learner   who

CGE4a    -demonstrates a confident and positive sense of self and respect for the dignity and welfare of others;

CGE4b    -demonstrates flexibility and adaptability;

CGE4c    -takes initiative and demonstrates Christian leadership;

CGE4d    -responds to, manages and constructively influences change in a discerning manner;

CGE4e    -sets appropriate goals and priorities in school, work and personal life;

CGE4f     -applies effective communication, decision-making, problem-solving, time and resource management skills;

CGE4g    -examines and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing life’s choices and opportunities;

CGE4h    -participates in leisure and fitness activities for a balanced and healthy lifestyle.

 

A Collaborative Contributor   who

CGE5a    -works effectively as an interdependent team member;

CGE5b    -thinks critically about the meaning and purpose of work;

CGE5c    -develops one’s God-given potential and makes a meaningful contribution to society;

CGE5d    -finds meaning, dignity, fulfillment and vocation in work which contributes to the common good;

CGE5e    -respects the rights, responsibilities and contributions of self and others;

CGE5f     -exercises Christian leadership in the achievement of individual and group goals;

CGE5g    -achieves excellence, originality, and integrity in one’s own work and supports these qualities in the work of others;

CGE5h    -applies skills for employability, self-employment and entrepreneurship relative to Christian vocation.

 

A Caring Family Member   who

CGE6a    -relates to family members in a loving, compassionate and respectful manner;

CGE6b    -recognizes human intimacy and sexuality as God given gifts, to be used as the creator intended;

CGE6c    -values and honours the important role of the family in society;

CGE6d    -values and nurtures opportunities for family prayer;   

CGE6e    -ministers to the family, school, parish, and wider community through service.

 

A Responsible Citizen   who

CGE7a    -acts morally and legally as a person formed in Catholic traditions;

CGE7b    -accepts accountability for one’s own actions;

CGE7c    -seeks and grants forgiveness;

CGE7d    -promotes the sacredness of life;

CGE7e    -witnesses Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a just, peaceful and compassionate society;

CGE7f     -respects and affirms the diversity and interdependence of the world’s peoples and cultures;

CGE7g    -respects and understands the history, cultural heritage and pluralism of today’s contemporary society;

CGE7h    -exercises the rights and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship;

CGE7i     -respects the environment and uses resources wisely;

CGE7j     -contributes to the common good.

 

Unit 3 | Unit 5 | Course Profiles Main Menu