Please note:
This document is best suited for on-screen use. Some layout may have been altered during the creation of this web page.

It is recommended that you download the "pdf" version of this Course Profile for printing and the "Word, Mac, or WordPerfect" versions for working with or adapting the Course Profile to meet your instructional needs.

 

Course Profile   English (ENG4U), Grade 12, University Preparation, Catholic

 

Course Overview

Policy Document:  The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 11 and 12, English, 2000.

Prerequisite:  Grade 11 English, University Preparation

Course Description

This course emphasizes consolidation of literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills. Students will analyse a range of challenging texts from various time periods, countries, and cultures. They will write analytical and argumentative essays and a major paper for an independent literary research project, and apply key concepts to analyse media works. An important focus will be on understanding academic language and using it coherently and confidently in discussion and argument.

How This Course Supports the Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations

Students in ENG4U explore the theme of literature as a forum for social commentary. Students identify the ways in which the dignity of the human person can be incorporated into literature. Students use Catholic social teachings to guide their understanding of a variety of texts and how gospel values play a significant role in creating socially just environments. Through the exploration of the relationship between literature and social justice, students are called to live the gospel values in their everyday lives. Themes of faith, stewardship, and communion are interwoven throughout the course.

Course Notes

This profile demonstrates one way in which the expectations of the Grade 12 University Preparation English course can be met. The course is divided into four theme-based units, and an Independent Study unit. The units include the study of different literary genres, with a particular emphasis on plays. The culminating activities of the course are the independent literary research project (independent study) and the final examination, which together make up 30% of the overall course mark. Writing process, final literary research essay, and oral presentation are all integral parts of the Independent study unit and may all be evaluated summatively. The content of the exam should be based on the expectations for this course, and students should be given opportunities throughout the course to practise answering questions similar to ones that they will see on their exam. Both content and style of writing should be addressed.

The teacher:

·         varies the use of resources and teaching strategies;

·         varies the assessment techniques respective to activities and includes rubrics, checklists, anecdotal comments, etc.;

·         balances individual and group work in order for pupils to achieve both individual and group goals, and to develop a confident and positive sense of self-respect as interdependent team members;

·         considers literary works that lend themselves to cross-genre comparison;

·         selects literary works that address the theme of social commentary;

·         integrates the Independent Study Unit throughout the course to maintain on-going communication, and to address expectations to be met by the time the students submit and present their study. Teacher-student conferencing for the Independent Study is on-going throughout the course;

·         should take an opportunity, once pieces of writing are evaluated and handed back to the students, to address and/or review common mechanical errors in their writing. The teacher instructs students to place the assessed written pieces in their writing folders. This is a good time to incorporate mini-lessons on grammar, spelling, punctuation usage, and sentence structure into their lesson plans.

·         should arrange a visit to a postsecondary library/resource centre for a research skills orientation, if possible.

·         reviews forms, codes, and conventions of media; the characteristics that define a particular genre, i.e., in plays, these would include lighting, props, sound effects.

·         should encourage students to attend a few English literature lectures at a nearby postsecondary institution (if possible) to give them further experience in lecture-style learning.

·         chooses Shakespearean texts that make social commentary in some way and guides students to this type of commentary.

·         can refer to these definitions when approaching Unit 5: Elizabethan Drama:

·         phonology: the study of the elementary speech sounds;

·         semantics: the study of the meaning of words and of the combination of words in phrases, sentences, and larger linguistic units;

·         formal scansion: the specific analysis of meter; a line by line analysis of +component feet indicating major pauses in phrasing in each line;

·         reviews the plagiarism policy as outlined in the school code of conduct.

The students:

·         keep a writing folder in the classroom where they file all of their process writing and final drafts of writing assignments;

·         regularly utilize the writing folder to inform and record self- and peer editing strategies which are integral to the writing process.

·         are expected to take notes during formal teacher-led lessons and during student discussions throughout the entire course.

Units:  Titles and Times

Unit 1

Novel Study

25 hours

Unit 2

Language Analysis and Literary Criticism

20 hours

Unit 3

Modern Drama

20 hours

* Unit 4

Elizabethan Drama

25 hours

Unit 5

Culminating Unit (includes Independent Study and final exam)

20 hours

* This unit is fully developed in this Course Profile.

Unit Overviews

Unit 1:  Novel Study

Time:  25 hours

Unit Description

This unit introduces students to the concept of social commentary. The unit explores the genre of the novel as a product of its cultural milieu and seeks to understand how a work of literature serves as an effective tool for social commentary. Skills taught include understanding of literary terms, narrative style, as well as, how these techniques enhance meaning in literature. Through the study of this novel, students gain a deeper understanding of the bi-directional relationship between themselves and their environment. This knowledge helps them to understand how gospel values play an integral role in creating environments that are socially just. Students discuss the moral dilemmas characters in the novel face and understand the relationship between the character’s decisions and the dignity of the individual. Students understand the relationship between social commentary and social change. They understand that, as fully committed Christians, they are obligated to answer the call and live the gospel by working for social change. Novels for this unit should be chosen for their potential to challenge students preparing for university and for their potential to make social commentary. As a first step in preparation of the Independent Study described in Unit 5, students select a play and novel to read independently. Students learn to make connections between the genres of plays, short stories, and poetry; students write a summative test and a comparative essay.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading, Writing, Language

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

LSV.01, LA2.01, LA2.02, LA2.05, LS1.01, LS1.03, LS1.04, LS1.05, MD1.05
CGE1d, CGE1g, CGE1i, CGE3f, CGE7a

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication

Students begin to read the novel. They research various authors’ culture and background to discover relationship between author and his or her work. Students present research to class in groups.

Oral Communication: Oral Presentation

2

LS1.01, LS1.02, LS1.03, LS1.04, LS1.05, LA2.01, LA2.02, LSV.01, WR1.02, WR2.02, WR2.04
CGE2b, CGE2d

Thinking/ Inquiry Communication Application

Cross-Genre Comparison – as students read through the novel, they explore works of other genres, such as poetry and short stories, that share a similar theme to the novel. Students discuss how ideas and literary styles subsume genre.

Paragraph Writing Skills – short written analysis of relationship between cultural context and social commentary.

3

LSV.01, LSl.01, LS1.03, LS1.03, LS1.04, LS1.05. LS3.03, WR2.04
CGE3E, CGE3f, CGE4g, CGE7a, CGE7c

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication

Assessing the nature of the novel

Journal Responses (Summative – writing folder)

4

LSV.02, LSV.03, LS1.01, LS1.04, LS2.02, LS3.01, LS3.02, WR1.02, WR1.03, WR1.04
CGE1a, CGE1g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication
Application

Review of literary terms such as theme, metaphor, and allusion. Discuss how rhetorical devices, elements of style, and characterization contribute to theme.

Oral Communication

Critical Thinking Unit test

5

LS1.02, LS3.01, LA1.03, LA1.04 WRV.01, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.01, WR1.02, WR1.03, WR2.02, WR2.03, WR2.04, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR4.04, WR5.01, WR5.02, WR5.03, WR5.04
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication
Application

Modelling of comparative essay writing. Culminating Task: Students choose either a poem or short story that is similar in theme to the course novel. Students write a comparative essay comparing the course novel to this choice.

Mini-lesson on sentence structure and punctuation rules. Students use self-editing, peer editing, and teacher conferences to refine their ideas as part of their ongoing writing folder development.

6

LSV.01
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication
Application

The students make their Independent Study selections which must be approved by the teacher. Independent reading of teacher-approved novel and play begins. Students are provided with a critical path indicating key Independent Study deadlines. Time management skills are reinforced.

 

Unit 2:  Language Analysis and Literary Criticism

Time:  20 hours

Unit Description

This unit examines a wide variety of literary criticism and language analysis. The focus of this unit is the development of student awareness of literary theory through deconstructing challenging non-fiction texts. The cultural and literary diversity of the criticisms studied provide essential knowledge required for the basis of any social commentary. Cultural sources for literary criticisms could include theories from: Ancient Greece, Canada, Britain, the United States, the Commonwealth (including: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, the Caribbean, Australia, and New Zealand) as well as South Africa. Students develop an understanding of foundational literary theory by examining critical theory, especially those key texts which inform postmodern literary criticism. Students are responsible for the planning and presentation of seminars. Through group work responsibilities, students demonstrate a confident and positive sense of self-respect as interdependent team members. This unit further develops students’ abilities as effective communicators. The students begin to locate secondary sources for their Independent Study, and submit their topic proposal for teacher approval.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Language, Literature Studies and Reading, and Writing

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

LAV.01, LAV.02, LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, LA2.01, LA2.05, LA2.06, LS1.01, LS2.01
CGE2b, CGE2d, CGE7g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry

An Introduction to Language Analysis Deconstructing Canadian essays – considering the following structures: Writer’s tone of voice and forms of argument

Mini Seminars

2

LSV.01, WRV.01, WRV.03, WRV.05, LA1.03, LS1.01, LS1.03, WR1.01, MD2.01, MD2.02, WR1.02, WR3.02
CGE2d, CGE7g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry
Application

Literary Periods (cultural differentiation)

Review of previous knowledge of literary periods

Research of a variety of genres and authors exemplifying each literary period

Production of succinct informative handout (to be included in a class literary period directory) – Students explore the process involved in conveying information through the print medium.

3

LAV.01, LAV.02, LSV.02, LSV.03, LA1.03, LA2.01, LA2.02
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication

Critical Literary Theory: Modern and Postmodern Aesthetic Criticism

Links made with other aesthetic theories, e.g., music, design, philosophy, and the visual arts

Contemporary literary theory is introduced, e.g., Feminist theory (oral communication)

4

LAV.01, LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03
CGE2b, CGE2d, CGE7g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication

Unpacking Postmodern Theory

Specific Deconstruction and Postmodern theory is expanded upon

Critical deconstructionist essays are analysed

5

LAV.02, LA2.05, LA2.06
CGE2b, CGE2d

Knowledge/ Understanding Communication

Teacher-led seminar skills workshop(s) modelling successful formal seminar presentational skills

6

LAV.02, LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, LA1.01, LS2.03, WR1.01, WR2.01
CGE2b, CGE2d, CGE7g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication

Group Seminars: Historical analysis of the development of literary theory

Handouts (summaries of critical theories)

7

LAV.02, LSV.01, LSV.02, LSV.03, LA1.01, LA2.01, LA2.04, LA2.05, LA2.06, WRV.03, WR2.01, WR2.02, WR2.03, WR3.02, WR5.02
CGE2b, CGE2c, CGE2d, CGE7g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication
Application

Formal Seminar (culminating task)

Seminars are delivered in teams

Peer assessment

Teacher – summative evaluation

8

WRV.01, WRV.02, LS3.03, WR5.01, LS1.01
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry Communication
Application

The teacher reviews the MLA format.

Critique sample critical essays. Apply critical structures to analyse the novel and play they are reading for their Independent Study.

The students begin to locate secondary sources to use for their Independent Study. Time is reserved in the library/resource centre for this purpose.

Students submit topic proposal for teacher approval.

Unit 3:  Modern Drama

Time:  21 hours

Unit Description

In this unit, students apply their knowledge of literary genres and theories acquired in Unit 2 to the study of a modern play. Students engage in research to explore the way history shapes our literature and reinforce their understanding through classroom discussions. Students also write expository and persuasive papers; deconstruct a media product, and collaborate to create a short work of modern drama and write a summative test. These tasks require students to consider how playwrights can make social commentary through dialogue and staging. Students consider how social commentary is a reflection of social justice as defined by Catholic Graduate Expectations. Students submit a bibliography listing the sources they are using to prepare for their Independent Study. The first student-teacher conference for the Independent Study takes place.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading, Writing, Language, Media

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

LSl.04, LSl.05, LA1.04, LA2.01, LA2.02, WR1.03
CGE3f CGE2d

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/ Inquiry
Communication

A review of the characteristics of the Modern period (art, architecture, poetry, and drama) Research global issues that have impacted on modern theatre.

Present findings in panel discussion format.

2

LS1.03
CGE3a

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication

Read play orally and analyse it.

Critical thinking reading strategies

Oral Communication

3

WR4.02, WR4.03, WR2.04, MD2.01, MD2.02
CGE3a

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Formal lesson on how set design, props, lighting, and staging create meaning

Students create a design of a set for the play and submit a written explanation of design choices.

4

MD1.04, MD1.01, MD1.03, WR2.02, WR3.02, WR4.02, WR5.04
CGE1a

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Analyse playwright’s use of stylistic devices and discuss responses evoked: close reading.

Analyse the forms, codes, and conventions of stagecraft.

In a supported-opinion paragraph, explain how this play is an artifact of modern drama and what implicit and explicit messages are conveyed.

5

LS2.01, LS2.02, LS1.01, LS3.01, LS3.02, LS3.03, LS3.04, WR2.030, WR4.02, WR5.01, MD1.02
CGE3a

Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Scriptwriting (Culminating Task)

Role-playing Presentation: Modern Drama

Teacher and peer-assessment

6

LS1.05, LS2.01, LS3.01, WRV.05
CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Unit Test

7

LS1.03, LS1.05, LS3.01, LS3.02, LS3.03, LS3.04, WR1.01
CGE2c, CGE3c

 

Apply what has been reviewed in the previous unit about the MLA Works Cited format, and submit a Works Cited listing the sources they are using to prepare for their Independent Unit.

Review rhetorical devices and elements of style as taught in Unit 1; identify and analyse significant devices present in their novel and play that they are reading for their Independent Study.

 

 

 

Unit 4:  Elizabethan Drama

Time:  25 hours

Unit Description

This unit provides the opportunity for students to apply the knowledge and skills developed in Units 2 and 3, while extending their facility with literary analysis. Students read and critically analyse a Shakespearean play. Students explore the concept of an archetype and its relationship to Christian imagery and Classical allusion. Students enhance their understanding of the phonological and semantic aspects of language through the study of allusion, imagery, and metaphor in Elizabethan Drama. At the same time, students engage in an examination of a wide variety of literary devices. Students plan oral presentations, role-play, conduct research, and write an essay. All activities in this unit relate to the same Shakespearean play. Throughout this unit, students consider whether the decisions made by the fictional characters of the Elizabethan stage reflect Catholic values and beliefs in the world of the twenty-first century. The teacher should take advantage of naturally occurring opportunities to explore the theme of social commentary. The second teacher-student conference for Independent Study takes place.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Language, Literature Studies and Reading, Writing

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

LSV.01, LSV.02, LS1.03, LS1.05, LS3.03, LAV.02, WR1.01, LA2.01, LA2.02, MDV.02
CGE2b, CGE5e, CGE5f

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Introduction to Globe Theatre and conventions of drama

Oral reading of play

Oral communication

Response journals

Analytic discussions and tutorials

2

LSV.03, LAV.01, LAV.02, LSV.01, LSV.02, LS1.01, LS1.04. LS1.05, LS2.01
CGE2b, CGE2d, CGE4f, CGE5e

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Introduce archetypes (i.e., the fool, the tragic hero)

Character analysis (the limitations of stock characters) Recurring archetypal patterns across culture and genre

Contemporary criticism of Shakespearean plays

The antagonist as foil

Role-playing – dramatizing a soliloquy

3

LSV.03, LAV.01, LAV.02, LS1.01, LS3.03, LS3.02, LS3.04, LA2.02, LA2.05
CGE2b, CGE2d

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Identifying common themes in Elizabethan Drama

Imagery and its relationship to theme

Recurring imagery in Elizabethan literature (Greek and Roman mythology/biblical allusion)

Analysing a passage

Student presentations

4

LSV.03, LS1.05, LS3.01, WR1.01, LAV.02
CGE2b, CGE4f

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Review stylistic devices (allusion, extended metaphor).

Literary analysis

Note-taking

Researching Greek and Roman mythological allusions

5

LAV.02, LSV.03, LS3.03, LAV.01, LS1.01, LS3.02, LS3.04, LA2.02, LA2.05
CGE2b, CGE2d

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Review allusion and extended metaphor.

Identification of allusion in textual analysis

Greek and Roman mythology (review prior learning)

Common biblical allusions – identifying these allusions in the text and relating to biblical passages

Research on Greek and Roman mythological characters

6

LS1.02, WRV.02, WRV.03, WRV.04, WRV.05, LAV.02, WR1.01, WR1.02, WR1.03, WR1.04, WR2.01, WR2.04, WR3.01, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR4.04, WR5.01, WR5.03, WR5.04

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Review essay techniques.

Review MLA format for documentation.

Self- or peer editing

7

LA2.07, LA2.06

 

The teacher sets up a schedule to conference with students about the progress on the Independent Studies

Unit 5:  Independent Study Unit

Time:  20 hours

Unit Description

This unit is ongoing throughout the entire course and it is meant to supplement the other units of study. The students choose a novel and a play containing a similar theme that they wish to investigate for their Independent Study. Students utilize the skills they have developed to discern connections between diverse literary works. Through the analysis of social commentary, comparative skills are modelled in the previous units. The students are given class time to work in the library/resource centre to gather sources and information on their author, as well as, literary/stylistic devices used in their literary works. Students regularly conference with the teacher to monitor progress. Students submit a comparative literary essay with a works-cited page listing the secondary sources they used. They also present a 15- to 20-minute seminar based on their Independent Study, using at least one audio and/or visual medium. This unit fosters effective communication, as well as time and resource management skills. The summative evaluation of this unit together with the final exam comprise 30% of this course.

Strand(s) & Learning Expectations

Strand(s):  Literature Studies and Reading, Writing, Language, and Media

Unit Overview Chart

Cluster

Learning Expectations

Assessment Categories

Focus

1

WRV.01, WRV.02, LS3.03, WR5.01
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Application

Review MLA format for documentation.

2

LS1.01, WRV.01
CGE2b

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Application

Critique sample critical essays.

Apply critical structures to analyse the literary works they are studying.

3

LS1.03, LS1.05, LS3.01, LS3.02, LS3.03, LS3.04, WR1.01
CGE2c, CGE3c

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Application

Review rhetorical devices and elements of style as taught in Unit 1.

Identify and analyse significant devices present in their nominated literary works.

4

WRV.04, WRV.05, WR1.02, WR1.03, WR1.04, WR4.01, WR4.02, WR4.03, WR4.04, WR5.03
CGE2b, CGE4e, CGE4f

Thinking/Inquiry

Communication
Application

Using secondary sources, write a literary essay comparing a play and a novel.

Writing Process: Peer and Self-Editing

Essay: teacher assessment

5

WR3.02, LS3.01, LA2.01, LA2.02, LA2.03, LA2.05, LA2.06, MDV.02, MD2.01
CGE2c, CGE4c, CGE5g

Knowledge/ Understanding Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application

Oral Seminar

Self, peer and teacher assessment

Assessment and Evaluation of Student Achievement

Seventy per cent of the grade will be based on assessments and evaluations conducted throughout the course. Thirty per cent of the grade will be based on a final evaluation in the form of an examination, performance, essay, and/or other methods of evaluation. Assessment contributing to the students’ final mark must be based on individual performance.

Accommodations

·         The teachers should consult individual IEPs for specific direction on accommodations for all identified students. Teachers are required to accommodate for the unique learning needs of students with Individual Education Plans (IEPs).

Resources

The resource list is neither prescriptive nor exclusive. The resources listed are only suggestions or examples. The teachers should feel free to choose novels or other works of literature that address the theme of social commentary.

The URLs for the websites were verified by the writers prior to publication. Given the frequency with which these designations change, teachers should always verify the websites prior to assigning them to student use.

Units in the Course Profile make reference to use of specific texts, magazines, films, videos, and websites. The teachers need to consult their board policies regarding the use of any copyrighted materials. Before reproducing materials for student use from printed publications, teachers need to ensure that their board has a Cancopy license and that their license covers the resources they wish to use. Before screening videos/films with their students, teachers need to ensure that their board/school has obtained the appropriate public performance videocassette license from an authorized distributor, e.g., Audio Cine Films Inc. Teachers are reminded that much of the material on the Internet is protected by copyright. The copyright is usually owned by the person, or organization that created the work. Reproduction of any work or substantial part of any work on the internet is not allowed without the permission of the owner.

Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms, 7th ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999.

Acker, Kathy – Literary Witches (gender theory) – http://acker.thehub

Bolt, Robert. A Man for All Seasons. USA: Vingate, 1965.

Beckett, Samuel. Waiting For Godot. New York: Grove/Atlantic, Inc., 1999.

Collings, Matthew. This is Modern Art. Great Britain: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999.

Conrad, Ronald. The Act of Writing: Canadian Essays for Composition, 5th ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 1999.

Derrida, Jacques – Deconstruction: Some Assumptions – http://www.brocku.ca/english/courses/4F70

Ryga, George. The Ecstasy of Rita Joe. Vancouver: Talonplays, 1970.

Elizabethan and Jacobean Theatre links – edusite – The Ever Reader (Oxford Shakespeare group newsletter) – http://www.everreader.com

Event Buildings Online (Globe Theatre) – http://wwww.greatbuildings.com/buildings

A Glossary of Literary Terms – http://www.uky.edu/AS/English/writprog/index.html

Index of the Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism – http://www.press.jhu.edu/books

Kingsolver, Barbara. Animal Dreams. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1990.

Knobler, Nathan. The Visual Dialogue: An Introduction to the Appreciation of Art. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.

Ionesco, Eugene. Rhinoceros. New York: Grove Press, 1960.

Laurence, Margaret. The Stone Angel. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc., 1988.

Literary Theory Links – http://www.anu.edu.au/english

Miller, Arthur. Death of a Salesman. New York: Viking Press, 1967.

(Annotated guide to scholarly resources)

Mr. William Shakespeare and the Internet
– http://shakespeare.palomar.edu
– http://www.andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Lit/

Postmodernism and Cyberculture – http://www.marist.edu/humanities/english/postmod.html

Ross, Stephen David, ed. Art and Its Significance: An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory, 2nd ed. New York: New York State University Press, 1987.

Shakespeare Birthplace Trust – http://www.shakespeare.org.uk/

Shange, Ntozake. For coloured girls who have considered suicide, when the rainbow is enuf: a choreo poem. New York: MacMillan, 1977.

Shakespeare Magazine – http://www.shakespearemag.com/

(Solioquies)

Shakespeare’s Monologue – http://www.Shakespeare-monologues.org/

Shahey’s Place 3D (Globe Theatre Internet Experience) – http://library.thinkguest.org/10502/

Barry, James and Joseph Griffin, ed. The Storyteller. Scarborough: Nelson Canada, 1992.

Taylor, Drew Hayden. Toronto At Dreamer’s Rock; and Education is our right – two one-act plays. Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1990.

Teaching Early Drama with Modern Technology
– http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~reed/DRAMA.HTML

The Social Significance of the Modern Drama
– http://www.pitzer.edu~dward/Anarchist_Archives/goldman/socsig/socsigtoc.html

Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory, an Introduction
– http://newmedia.cgu.edu/literarytheory/Texts/eagleton.html

 


Coded Expectations, English, Grade 12, University, ENG4U

Literature Studies and Reading

Overall Expectations

LSV.01 · read and demonstrate an understanding of complex texts from various time periods, countries, and cultures, with an emphasis on analysing and assessing ideas, themes, concepts, and arguments;

LSV.02 · demonstrate an understanding of the elements of fiction, drama, poetry, and non-fiction, with an emphasis on plays and essays;

LSV.03 · analyse the elements of style in a variety of texts and assess their effects.

Specific Expectations

Understanding the Meaning of Texts

LS1.01 – analyse and assess ideas, themes, concepts, and arguments in print and electronic texts (e.g., assess how the use of multiple perspectives in a novel contributes to its theme; analyse an author’s use of irony based on a close reading of a poem);

LS1.02 – select and use significant and compelling evidence from texts to support critical analyses (e.g., prepare an oral presentation explaining how the recognition scene in a Shakespearean tragedy deepens the play’s impact; write a critical review of an essay, focusing on bias);

LS1.03 – select and use a range of effective reading strategies (e.g., research the life of an author using a literary encyclopedia; read closely and accurately to identify specific information; use an electronic version of a literary text to track significant words or images; compare the print and film versions of a dramatic scene);

LS1.04 – compare values, perspectives, and world views in texts (e.g., compare the moral and spiritual values of an evolving character at different stages in a literary work; outline the similarities and differences in the perspectives of the protagonists in two literary works);

LS1.05 – analyse the influence of social, cultural, and economic values and perspectives on the themes and interpretations of texts (e.g., examine various texts about a social or political issue such as human rights or anti-Semitism to analyse and suggest reasons for authors’ different approaches).

Understanding the Forms of Texts

LS2.01 – analyse and assess how key elements of challenging plays and essays reinforce the works’ themes and ideas (intensive study) (e.g., analyse how imagery in a tragedy contributes to the theme; assess how the organization of an essay strengthens the persuasiveness of the argument);

LS2.02 – analyse and assess how elements of challenging texts in literary forms other than plays and essays are used to enhance meaning (extensive study) (e.g., assess the use of symbols and images to generate multiple meanings in a historical novel; analyse the ways in which settings add layers of meaning in a short story);

LS2.03 – analyse and assess how elements of demanding non-fiction texts influence their meaning (e.g., compare the use and effectiveness of inductive and deductive organizational patterns in two newspaper editorials).

Understanding the Elements of Style

LS3.01 – analyse how language and syntax are used in texts to create particular effects (e.g., analyse how language is used to create pathos in a play; analyse the language used to create an ironic tone in an essay);

LS3.02 – analyse how authors use a variety of literary and rhetorical devices to help convey meaning and strengthen the impact of a text (e.g., contrast the ways in which authors use dramatic irony to create sympathy for their protagonists; analyse the rhetorical techniques, such as juxtaposition and allusion, used to support the argument in a film review);

LS3.03 – assess the effect on the reader of authors’ choices of language, syntax, and literary and rhetorical devices by examining their own and others’ interpretations of the style of texts;

LS3.04 – analyse how authors and editors use design elements to enhance meaning and strengthen the impact of a text (e.g., assess the effect of the font style and spacing of a poem; analyse and comment on the design layout of a textbook).

Writing

Overall Expectations

WRV.01 · use a range of print and electronic primary and secondary sources to gather and assess information and ideas and to develop and refine topics for writing;

WRV.02 · select and use writing forms suited to various purposes and audiences, with an emphasis on analytic and argumentative essays and narratives or dramatic scenes;

WRV.03 · use a range of organizational structures and patterns to produce unified, coherent, and effective written work;

WRV.04 · revise their written work, independently and collaboratively, with a focus on sufficient development of content, coherent organization, clear expression, and effective style;

WRV.05 · edit and proofread to produce final drafts, using correctly the grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation conventions of standard Canadian English, as specified for this course, with the support of print and electronic resources when appropriate.

Specific Expectations

Generating Ideas and Gathering Information

WR1.01 – investigate potential topics for written work, including a literary independent study project, by devising research questions, identifying information needs and purposes for writing, and developing research plans to acquire information and ideas from primary and secondary sources (e.g., review a library serials index to establish the availability of periodicals; investigate access to public and postsecondary collections of reference materials; create electronic bookmarks to organize links to other sources of information);

WR1.02 – organize and synthesize significant information, ideas, and sources to suit specific forms and purposes for writing (e.g., group interpretations for an analytical essay; identify key concepts to develop the argument of an essay for an independent study project);

WR1.03 – formulate and refine a thesis to develop content for academic and expressive writing by making inferences and thinking divergently about information and ideas from prior knowledge and research (e.g., reconcile conflicting perspectives for a seminar report on Shakespearean tragedy; use knowledge of the period to rewrite a section of a historical novel from the point of view of a minor character);

WR1.04 – evaluate information and ideas to determine whether they are sufficient, authoritative, significant, and suitable to the form and the purpose for writing.

Choosing the Form to Suit the Purpose and Audience

WR2.01 – demonstrate an understanding of the uses and conventions of various forms by writing analytic and argumentative essays, critical reviews, expressive works such as narratives or dramatic scenes, and an independent research essay or report (e.g., adapt an episode in a novel to create a dramatic scene; write an essay providing a close analysis of a novella);

WR2.02 – select and use an appropriate form to produce written work for an intended audience and purpose (e.g., write a critical review of the film of a literary work studied in the course; write an essay comparing the central characters in two novels from different periods);

WR2.03 – analyse the characteristics of literary and informational texts as models of writing for specific purposes and audiences;

WR2.04 – select and use a voice and style appropriate to academic and personal writing (e.g., use an authoritative voice, develop a thesis, and support their arguments in an essay analysing characters or techniques in a literary work; write a soliloquy in the "voice" of the antagonist in a play).

Organizing Ideas and Information in Written Work

WR3.01 – use essay structure and report structure and patterns such as induction, deduction, analogy, process analysis, climactic order, chronological order, and cause and effect to organize information and ideas in essays, critical reviews, and reports (e.g., organize and unify the main ideas in an argumentative essay through the use of analogy; organize an argument in a report by acknowledging and rebutting alternative positions);

WR3.02 – select and use appropriate organizational devices and patterns to structure creative works and multimedia presentations (e.g., use categorization to organize information and ideas in an oral presentation for an independent study project).

Revising Drafts

WR4.01 – revise drafts to strengthen content and improve organization by connecting ideas, themes, or issues to critical concepts; exploring the complexities of the controlling idea; reconciling different perspectives; reinforcing arguments with compelling evidence; and reordering arguments for improved coherence and impact (e.g., consider the implications of evidence to strengthen an essay’s controlling idea; use climactic order to emphasize the most powerful and convincing argument in support of the thesis);

WR4.02 – revise drafts to improve clarity of expression (e.g., use feedback from peer conferences to rephrase passages or combine sentences for more concise, authoritative, and emphatic expression in an academic essay; examine writing for precise use of technical terminology);

WR4.03 – revise drafts to ensure an effective style (e.g., select words with connotations that deepen the meaning and impact of writing; examine writing for use of inclusive and anti-discriminatory language; assess the effectiveness of diction in a monologue by listening to a recording of it);

WR4.04 – revise drafts to integrate researched information, ideas, concepts, and quotations effectively and ethically (e.g., use identifying words and phrases to refer to sources, parenthetical referencing, and bibliographies in a research essay or report).

Editing, Proofreading, and Publishing

WR5.01 – cite researched information, ideas, and quotations in a consistent manner according to acceptable research methodology (e.g., cite sources using a recognized style such as that of the Modern Language Association [MLA] or the traditional footnote/endnote system known as the Chicago style);

WR5.02 – produce, format, and publish written work, using appropriate technology to share writing with intended audiences (e.g., develop graphics and other visual aids to support the oral presentation of a literary independent study project; use a desktop publishing program to format and publish a script on a student-writing website);

WR5.03 – identify strengths and weaknesses in their writing skills and create action plans for improvement;

WR5.04 – edit and proofread their own and others’ writing, identifying and correcting errors according to the requirements for grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation listed below:

q   Grammar and Usage: use a variety of sentence structures to communicate complex ideas effectively, logically, coherently, and emphatically, with a focus on subordination, transitions, parallelism, and word order;

q   Grammar and Usage: use pronoun case, number, and person correctly (e.g., use proper case for pronouns in comparisons using than or as);

q   Grammar and Usage: choose verb voice and mood to suit the purpose and audience (e.g., use the active voice to emphasize the doer of the action and to avoid dangling or misrelated modifiers; use the passive voice to emphasize the receiver of the action or to minimize the importance of the doer of the action);

q   Grammar and Usage: show understanding that grammar may be used unconventionally for a particular effect in oral language, advertising, poetry, or direct speech of characters in fiction and plays;

q   Spelling: demonstrate an understanding of a wide range of spelling patterns, rules, and strategies by recognizing and correcting their own and others’ spelling errors (e.g., apply knowledge of rules for the use of hyphens, particularly in spelling compound adjectives; maintain a list of words that do not follow spelling rules);

q   Spelling: spell correctly specific academic, historical, and technical terms used in writing;

q   Spelling: use a range of print and electronic resources to flag possible errors and improve spelling (e.g., consult an up-to-date dictionary for the spelling of hyphenated words);

q   Punctuation: use punctuation to achieve clarity, and for rhetorical and stylistic effect (e.g., understand the purposes of punctuation marks to enhance clarity, emphasis, and rhythm; read aloud written work to ensure that sentences are punctuated as they are intended to be heard).

Language

Overall Expectations

LAV.01 · use knowledge of recent developments in the English language, vocabulary and language structures, and the conventions of standard Canadian English to read, write, and speak effectively;

LAV.02 · use listening techniques and oral communication skills to participate in classroom discussions and more formal activities, with a focus on using academic language appropriately in seminars and presentations of independent study projects.

Specific Expectations

Developing Vocabulary and Knowledge of Language Structures and Conventions

LA1.01 – apply a variety of strategies to extend vocabulary while reading, with an emphasis on discerning nuances and judging the precision of words (e.g., find examples of cliché, jargon, and redundancy in texts and suggest fresh, vivid, and concise alternatives; create a web of words associated with a coined word in a poem);

LA1.02 – analyse the origins and roots of words used in different areas of science and technology (e.g., medicine, computer studies, communications technology, space technology);

LA1.03 – select appropriate academic and technical language and use it with precision in oral and written work;

LA1.04 – recognize, describe, and use correctly, in oral and written language, the language structures of standard Canadian English and its conventions of grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation, as prescribed for this course (e.g., consult recognized style guides for information about language conventions).

Developing Listening and Speaking Skills

LA2.01 – communicate orally in large and small groups for a variety of purposes, with a focus on challenging and extending the ideas of others; using academic and theoretical concepts and language; and discussing the coherence, relevance, strengths, and weaknesses of ideas and arguments;

LA2.02 – communicate orally in group discussions, applying such skills as the following: leading and contributing to productive discussions; suggesting possibilities and selecting directions within the group; generating ideas; contributing information; connecting ideas and arguments to other knowledge; making inferences; assessing the process used to reach conclusions; and fulfilling roles and completing tasks as required to produce presentations and products of high academic quality;

LA2.03 – use critical listening skills to analyse and assess the content of oral presentations (e.g., assess the validity of the presenter’s sources, arguments, and conclusions; detect assumptions and omissions, and provide missing information);

LA2.04 – assess oral presentations to explain how rhetorical devices, academic and technical language, answers to challenging questions, and technological aids are used to persuade, enhance credibility, and capture the interest of the audience;

LA2.05 – use effective strategies, such as researching information and ideas, organizing, rehearsing, and revising, to plan and present seminars, debates, and independent study projects;

LA2.06 – use techniques for making effective oral presentations, with a focus on organizing material coherently; providing significant evidence; using imagery, analogy, and parallel structures; and incorporating participatory activities, visual aids, and technology;

LA2.07 – identify strengths and weaknesses in their oral communication skills and create an action plan for improvement.

Media Studies

Overall Expectations

MDV.01 · demonstrate an understanding of a variety of media, media theories, and media industry practices by analysing representations, forms, and techniques in media works and assessing their implications for individuals and society;

MDV.02 · demonstrate an understanding of the relationships among form, content, purpose, audience, and production techniques by designing or creating media works, independently and collaboratively, based on ideas, themes, and issues examined in this course, and assessing their effectiveness.

Specific Expectations

Analysing Media and Media Works

MD1.01 – use critical thinking skills to identify bias and to analyse the differences between explicit and implicit messages in media works (e.g., analyse and assess the representation of Canadian culture in a wide range of films and television programs; analyse and assess the newspaper, television, radio, and Internet coverage of a conflict or uprising);

MD1.02 – explain how representation, form, style, and techniques in media works convey messages with social, ideological, and political implications (e.g., compare advertisements promoting healthy living as presented in different media forms; compare the coverage of a business or political news story in a range of newspapers, news magazines, radio and television newscasts, and on the Internet);

MD1.03 – explain the relationship between media works and their audiences (e.g., research how an advertiser adapts a campaign for different regional, cultural, or socio- economic groups; write a report on the ways in which various citizen groups use the media for specific purposes);

MD1.04 – apply key concepts of media theory to analyse specific media works (e.g., examine the coverage of an issue or event by a variety of media to assess Marshall McLuhan’s statement “The medium is the message”);

MD1.05 – identify and explain the conditions that affect media industry practices governing the production, financing, and distribution of media works (e.g., gather data for an argumentative essay by investigating the ownership and control of media businesses and the implications for public access, range of expression, and audience choice).

Creating Media Works

MD2.01 – design or create media works based on ideas, themes, and issues examined in this course (e.g., create a short videotaped editorial on a current issue or topic, using available resources; create a multimedia presentation for peers for an independent study project);

MD2.02 – demonstrate an understanding of the relationships among form, content, purpose, audience, and production options in their creations; assess the effectiveness of the works; and evaluate the choices made during the production process (e.g., maintain a learning log to record stages in the design and production process).

 


Ontario Catholic School Graduate Expectations

 

The graduate is expected to be:

 

A Discerning Believer Formed in the Catholic Faith Community  who

 

CGE1a    -illustrates a basic understanding of the saving story of our Christian faith;

CGE1b    -participates in the sacramental life of the church and demonstrates an understanding of the centrality of the Eucharist to our Catholic story;

CGE1c    -actively reflects on God’s Word as communicated through the Hebrew and Christian scriptures;

CGE1d    -develops attitudes and values founded on Catholic social teaching and acts to promote social responsibility, human solidarity and the common good;

CGE1e    -speaks the language of life... “recognizing that life is an unearned gift and that a person entrusted with life does not own it but that one is called to protect and cherish it.” (Witnesses to Faith)

CGE1f     -seeks intimacy with God and celebrates communion with God, others and creation through prayer and worship;

CGE1g    -understands that one’s purpose or call in life comes from God and strives to discern and live out this call throughout life’s journey;

CGE1h    -respects the faith traditions, world religions and the life-journeys of all people of good will;

CGE1i     -integrates faith with life;

CGE1j     -recognizes that “sin, human weakness, conflict and forgiveness are part of the human journey” and that the cross, the ultimate sign of forgiveness is at the heart of redemption. (Witnesses to Faith)

 

An Effective Communicator   who

CGE2a    -listens actively and critically to understand and learn in light of gospel values;

CGE2b    -reads, understands and uses written materials effectively;

CGE2c    -presents information and ideas clearly and honestly and with sensitivity to others;

CGE2d    -writes and speaks fluently one or both of Canada’s official languages;

CGE2e    -uses and integrates the Catholic faith tradition, in the critical analysis of the arts, media, technology and information systems to enhance the quality of life.

 

A Reflective and Creative Thinker   who

CGE3a    -recognizes there is more grace in our world than sin and that hope is essential in facing all challenges;

CGE3b    -creates, adapts, evaluates new ideas in light of the common good;

CGE3c    -thinks reflectively and creatively to evaluate situations and solve problems;

CGE3d    -makes decisions in light of gospel values with an informed moral conscience;

CGE3e    -adopts a holistic approach to life by integrating learning from various subject areas and experience;

CGE3f     -examines, evaluates and applies knowledge of interdependent systems (physical, political, ethical, socio-economic and ecological) for the development of a just and compassionate society.

 

A Self-Directed, Responsible, Life Long Learner   who

CGE4a    -demonstrates a confident and positive sense of self and respect for the dignity and welfare of others;

CGE4b    -demonstrates flexibility and adaptability;

CGE4c    -takes initiative and demonstrates Christian leadership;

CGE4d    -responds to, manages and constructively influences change in a discerning manner;

CGE4e    -sets appropriate goals and priorities in school, work and personal life;

CGE4f     -applies effective communication, decision-making, problem-solving, time and resource management skills;

CGE4g    -examines and reflects on one’s personal values, abilities and aspirations influencing life’s choices and opportunities;

CGE4h    -participates in leisure and fitness activities for a balanced and healthy lifestyle.

 

A Collaborative Contributor   who

CGE5a    -works effectively as an interdependent team member;

CGE5b    -thinks critically about the meaning and purpose of work;

CGE5c    -develops one’s God-given potential and makes a meaningful contribution to society;

CGE5d    -finds meaning, dignity, fulfillment and vocation in work which contributes to the common good;

CGE5e    -respects the rights, responsibilities and contributions of self and others;

CGE5f     -exercises Christian leadership in the achievement of individual and group goals;

CGE5g    -achieves excellence, originality, and integrity in one’s own work and supports these qualities in the work of others;

CGE5h    -applies skills for employability, self-employment and entrepreneurship relative to Christian vocation.

 

A Caring Family Member   who

CGE6a    -relates to family members in a loving, compassionate and respectful manner;

CGE6b    -recognizes human intimacy and sexuality as God given gifts, to be used as the creator intended;

CGE6c    -values and honours the important role of the family in society;

CGE6d    -values and nurtures opportunities for family prayer;

CGE6e    -ministers to the family, school, parish, and wider community through service.

 

A Responsible Citizen   who

CGE7a    -acts morally and legally as a person formed in Catholic traditions;

CGE7b    -accepts accountability for one’s own actions;

CGE7c    -seeks and grants forgiveness;

CGE7d    -promotes the sacredness of life;

CGE7e    -witnesses Catholic social teaching by promoting equality, democracy, and solidarity for a just, peaceful and compassionate society;

CGE7f     -respects and affirms the diversity and interdependence of the world’s peoples and cultures;

CGE7g    -respects and understands the history, cultural heritage and pluralism of today’s contemporary society;

CGE7h    -exercises the rights and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship;

CGE7i     -respects the environment and uses resources wisely;

CGE7j     -contributes to the common good.

 

Unit 4 | Course Profiles Main Menu